Cease and desist letters never work in this case.” “This lawsuit is a joke,” Schweikert campaign spokesperson Chris Baker told New Times. Still, Schweikert reportedly received a cease and desist letter from CarGuard’s legal team ahead of the lawsuit referencing. That website includes a different image of Norton with a crown photoshopped onto his head with a nearly identical tagline: “King of the Robocall Rip-Off Who Tries to Scam Consumers with Bogus Car Warranties.” The campaign operates its own separate landing page,, where it articulates its qualms with Norton. He had no knowledge of the website before the lawsuit was filed, according to his political consultant. Schweikert’s campaign has no connection to the super PAC, which has not spent advertising dollars promoting his candidacy during this election cycle. Defendants and their agents further acted with spite and ill will in their disparagement of CarGuard.” “Defendants and their agents also knew … that CarGuard does not defraud or scam its customers. “Defendants and their agents made false statements about CarGuard to the public, on the website, that were highly offensive to a reasonable person and damaging to the company’s reputation,” the lawsuit reads. In court documents, CarGuard fervently denies these claims. The insurer is accused of spamming Arizonans with illegal robocalls and failing to fulfill warranties for superfluous reasons. Along with a photoshopped image of the insurance executive wearing a velvet crown, the site dubs Norton “King of the Robocall Rip-Off,” stemming from four other lawsuits against CarGuard and dozens of complaints with the Better Business Bureau.Īmericans for Accountability in LeadershipĬustomer grievances with CarGuard are twofold. The new lawsuit centers around a website,, funded by the super PAC. A woman from Paradise Valley recently donated $75,000. The super PAC has more than $200,000 on hand, according to Federal Election Commission documents filed in May. Jason Scalese, an agent for the public relations firm and the super PAC, did not respond to calls, emails, tweets, and LinkedIn messages from New Times. Also named as defendants are 10 anonymous employees and contractors. The so-called “faceless organization,” Americans for Accountability in Leadership, is named as a defendant alongside its consultant, Liberty Strategic Partners LLC, and its advertising firm, Persuade Public Relations LLC, both based in California. “For this faceless organization to lie and call us a scam for political gain is despicable and will not be tolerated.” Ripple is still growing very, very quickly,” Garlinghouse said.“CarGuard is an industry leader in the automotive industry, has serviced over 200,000 customers, and paid millions of dollars in claims,” CarGuard CEO Trevor Smith told Phoenix New Times on Wednesday. “If Ripple loses the case, does anything change? It’s basically just status quo. Coinbase, for example, halted trading of XRP soon after the SEC filed the lawsuit against Ripple. He added that investors cannot trade XRP in the U.S. The SEC only has jurisdiction in the United States, and in some ways … How the world is operating right now is as if the case has been lost. The Ripple executive quickly emphasized that in that situation, XRP would only be considered a security in the United States. Ripple disagreed with the SEC and has since been fighting a legal battle with the securities regulator.ĭuring the interview, Garlinghouse was asked what would happen if he does not get a ruling in his favor and XRP is deemed a security. The SEC sued Ripple Labs, Garlinghouse, and co-founder Chris Larsen in December 2020, alleging that the XRP sale was an unregistered securities offering. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) over XRP earlier this month in an interview with Axios at the Collision 2022 event. Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse discussed the lawsuit brought by the U.S. Ripple’s CEO Discusses Implications of SEC Winning the Lawsuit Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) over the sale of xrp, which the regulator claims to be an unregistered securities offering. Ripple’s chief executive has shared his views on possible outcomes of the lawsuit brought by the U.S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |